- PERSPECTIVE -

- EVERYONE SEEMS NORMAL UNTIL YOU GET TO KNOW THEM! -

My Photo
Name:
Location: London, Canada

Thanks for reading my blog.

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

U.S. Gun Control

The "Perspective" research department, after an exhaustive study, has come up with this amazing fact..............!

If you consider that there has been an average of 160,000 troops in the Iraq Theater of operations during the last 22 months, and a total of 2112 deaths, that gives a firearm death rate of 60 per 100,000.

The firearms death rate in Washington D.C. is 80.6 per 100,000.

That means that you are about 25% more likely to be shot and killed in the Nation's Capitol than you are in Iraq.

Conclusion: You should immediately pull out of Washington D.C.

Your "Live from the front" scribe;
Allan W Janssen

Allan W Janssen is the author of the book The Plain Truth About God (What the mainstream religions don't want you to know!) and is available at the web site www.God-101.com

Visit the blog "Perspective" at http://God-101.blogspot.com

Labels: , , ,

Friday, March 14, 2008

Bush will leave his legacy.

Bend over everyone, Georgie W wants to give us a parting gift.

From its inception the Bush administration has been driven by one goal -- to secure U.S. access to foreign oil. That was laid out plainly in 2001, in a document called Strategic Energy Policy: Challenges for the 21st Century.

U.S. conservatives believe the United States not only has a right but a duty to use its military might to secure its conventional energy supply.

Also, there's a line of thinking in Washington that says you can't pacify Iraq or Afghanistan without tackling Iran, because Iran covertly supports insurgencies in both countries.

Neither Bush nor Vice-President Dick Cheney is running again. They may feel they have little to lose in launching a conflict that fulfils their ideological mission and, once begun, will be very difficult for the next president to stop.

This dangerous situation should come as no surprise to anyone since Georgie has made his intentions clear right from the get-go. As a matter of fact, that's one of the few positive things that can be said about this administration, they have been outright honest in what they want.

To put a little "Perspective" on the situation I would like to quote from an editorial in the local paper by Michael Den Tandt:

Then there was the bombshell dropped last November by the U.S. intelligence community.

In a paper entitled Iran: Nuclear Intentions and Capabilities (you can find it with Google), the agency that oversees all U.S. intelligence gathering said: "We judge with high confidence that in fall 2003, Tehran halted its nuclear weapons program."

You might have assumed that would be the end of that. Given the unfolding disaster in Iraq, not even Bush could excuse or rationalize war with Iran. The Iraq war has already cost $500 billion US.

The U.S. economy is in recession. And the price of crude oil has shot to a staggering $110 a barrel. Iran produces an estimated 3.8 million barrels of oil a day, accounting for 5% of global supply.

No one denies that a military attack on Iran would push crude far higher, with disastrous impact on global growth. And the economic consequences are the least of it. A U.S. attack on Iran easily could lead to a corresponding attack by Iran on Israel, which then could ignite the wider Middle Eastern war that so many have feared since 9/11.

Here's what makes this a real concern. Bush and many of the people around him believe that Iran must be prevented from acquiring nuclear capacity at all costs.

Their stated reason is that the Shia mullahs who control Iran are insane Islamofascists, and therefore cannot be trusted to withhold use of the bomb out of a desire for self-preservation, as the Soviet Union did during the Cold War.

Subjected to even a little scrutiny, this rationale doesn't hold up.

Saddam Hussein truly was insane, and even he didn't dare use chemical weapons of mass destruction against the Americans, when he had them, back in 1991.

The deeper motivation likely is far colder. Iran is acknowledged as the rising power in the Middle East and it sits on one of the world's last remaining large pools of cheaply accessible crude.
And that's the name of that tune Bunky!

(On a side note here, Canada has nearly as much oil in the Alberta Tar Sands as Saudi Arabia has so maybe that fence they wanted to put up between Canada and the States isn't such a bad idea after all!")

Your "News from the Front" scribe;
Allan W Janssen

Allan W Janssen is the author of the book The Plain Truth About God (What the mainstream religions don't want you to know!) and is available at the web site www.God-101.com

Visit the blog "Perspective" at http://God-101.blogspot.com

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, March 05, 2008

The Politics of Fear!

Back in the 1950's President Dwight Eisenhower gave a farewell speech in which he said' "Beware the Military Industrial Complex" and truer words were never spoken.

History has proven this warning as prophetic and all too accurate as we have seen over the last half century.

Companies such as Big Oil and Haliburton and all the defense contractors have called the shots in Washington and politicians have danced to their tune.

To give you an example of this............... why has no one in the current Presidential race questioned what the States is doing in Iraq in the first place?

Afghanistan is fairly cut and dried since that is the home of the Taliban and also al-Qaeda but we really have only two interests in Iraq. One is the "OIL" and the second was "W" getting even with Saddam Hussein for his father.

There really is no logical reason for America to be in Iraq and I can't for the life of me understand why nobody has said so!!!!

Sure I know the "politics of fear" goes a long way, but to ruin the economy to the tune of trillions of dollars, and thousands of lives, while the defense contractors make money hand over fist is NUTS kids.

But, who listens to me anyway!

Your "frustated" author;
Allan W Janssen

Allan W Janssen is the author of the book The Plain Truth About God (What the mainstream religions don't want you to know!) and is available at the web site www.God-101.com

Visit the blog "Perspective" at http://God-101.blogspot.com

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, December 05, 2007

Let Bush come clean on Iran, not the other way around!

Let's see if I have this right.

A U.S. intelligence agency reported yesterday that Iran had actually stopped their weapons program back in 2003 and was not nearly the threat the Bush administration had made them out to be!

That was yesterday. Today, as if he hadn't heard a thing, President Bush said; "Iran should reveal the full extent of its nuclear programme, or risk further international isolation."

Yes kids, this is the same guy who kept insisting there were "weapons of mass destruction" hidden in Iraq when all they kept finding was sand and more sand!

(This is also the guy that illegaly spied on Americans, and when they caught him said he was going to do it anyway and nobody said boo!)

I am not sure of anything about the Bush Administration except this..... Either they are really fucking stupid or they think the American public is, because something sure ain't right down there!

Allan W Janssen is the author of The Plain Truth About God at www.God-101.com and the blog "Perspective" at http://God-101.blogspot.com

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Blackwater up shit creek!

I should have saved this piece for Saturday Morning Confusion because I'm confused as hell.

Th U.S. has got itself a nice little war going on in Iraq and how or why they got there is incidental to the point I would like to make.

You got a war? You send in the army! Right?

Then what is this crap with private security forces?

First and most important is that an army would be a legal extension of a country's foreign policy and would be held accountable for their actions.

Any gang of hired mercenaries they send in have none of these restraints on them and they would have carte-blanche to do whatever they wanted.

Guess what!!!

That is exactly what is happening and not only the Iraqi's but the rest of the world community are not amused. Murder and general mayhem are the "special of the day" in Iraq now that Blackwater has been let loose on the population.

The methods of private security contractors in Iraq faced intensified scrutiny on Tuesday, as local police and government officials accused guards in a vehicle convoy of opening fire on a car and killing two Iraqi Christian women, then speeding away from the scene.

Tuesday's shooting occurred at a Baghdad intersection when the women's car approached the stopped convoy, said policeman Riyadh Majid, who witnessed the incident from a nearby checkpoint.

Majid told the Associated Press that the convoy guards threw a smoke bomb, apparently to warn the car against proceeding. The woman driving the car tried to stop, but was killed along with the passenger when two guards in the convoy opened fire, he said.

He said the convoy then raced away and Iraqi police came to collect the bodies and tow the blood-splattered car to the local police station.

Khalaf said initial findings showed the guards fired 19 bullets.

"These are innocent people killed by people who have no heart or consciousness. The Iraqi people have no value to them," said a man who was part of a group of relatives gathered with a Christian priest at the local police station.
The incident comes a day after the Iraqi government accused the U.S. security firm Blackwater of deliberately firing on civilians in a crowded Baghdad square last month, allegedly killing as many as 17 people. The firm insists its contractors were acting in self-defence.

My second point is that the United States has an army, a navy, an air force, the marines, the coast guard, civil defense, reserves and all sorts of crazies running around with guns so why do they have to go out and get "hired guns" on top of it all?

If they are that desperate, let them go up to Michigan and round up a few right wing militia's and set them loose in Iraq. They couldn't do any worse than Blackwater.

What's that? Oh yea, right! Then the administration wouldn't be able to siphon any money to their right wing buddies in the security business.

Between Haliburton, Blackwater, Iraqi oil and God knows what else this whole thing is really getting out of hand.

But, you know what they say! Business is Business!

Allan W Janssen is the author of The Plain Truth About God at www.God-101.com and the blog "Perspective" at http://God-101.blogspot.com

Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, September 06, 2007

Go back to where you came from.

This article was sent to me by my brother-in-law in Glasgow. Apparently it's a true story so I thought I would pass it on!

A Muslim woman dressed in a Burkha (A black gown & face mask) was
standing with her shopping in a queue at the checkout.

When it was her turn to be served, and as she reached the cashier,
she made a loud remark about the English Flag lapel pin, which the female
cashier was wearing on her blouse.

The cashier reached up and touched the pin and said, "Yes, I always
wear it proudly. My son serves abroad with the forces and I wear it for him".

The Muslim woman then asked the cashier when she was going to stop
bombing and killing her countrymen, explaining that she was Iraqi.

At that point, a Gentleman standing in the queue stepped forward, and
interrupted with a calm and gentle voice, and said to the Iraqi woman.

"Excuse me, but hundreds of thousands of men and women, just like this
ladies son have fought and sacrificed their lives so that people just
like YOU can stand here, in England, which is MY country and allow you
to blatantly accuse an innocent check-out cashier of bombing YOUR countrymen".

"It is my belief that if you were allowed to be as outspoken as that in
Iraq, which you claim to be YOUR country, then we wouldn't need to be
fighting there today".

"However - now that you have learned how to speak out and criticize the
English people who have afforded you the protection of MY country, I
will gladly pay the cost of a ticket to help you pay your way back to Iraq".

"When you get there, and if you manage to survive for being as
outspoken as what you are here in England, then you should be able to
help straighten out the mess which YOUR Iraqi countrymen have got you
into in the first place, which appears to be the reason that you have
come to MY country to avoid."
Apparently the queue (lineup, for you Americans) cheered and applauded.

Allan W Janssen is the author of The Plain Truth About God at www.God-101.com

Labels: , , , , ,

Saturday, August 25, 2007

Asshole of the Week: Fox News.

I will make this short and sweet. Fox News wins this weeks "Asshole of the week"award and a loud fart for beating war drums for the invasion of Iran.

Whether Fox News is being used by the Bush administration or not, other networks are shouting warnings about the American people getting sucked into another war in the Middle-East!

So far they have not been able to temper Fox News and their war retoric. The last thing America needs is another Iraq.

Fox News should act more responsibly. Here is a video you will find interesting.

Your "live from the front" scribe;
Allan W Janssen

Allan W Janssen is the author of The Plain Truth About God at www.God-101.com

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, July 30, 2007

Oh My God!



Allan W Janssen is the author of The Plain Truth About God-101 at www.God-101.com

Labels: , , ,

Friday, March 30, 2007

Analysis: Islam, Sectarian Tensions!

Guest Post - Shia vs. Sunni across the Middle East.
CBC News

The schism that rends the Islamic faith has its origins in centuries-old theology, but modern politics and demographics keep it alive and well across the Middle East.

Shia Muslims are a minority in global Islam, often shunned or despised by conservative Sunnis, but they are an active and increasingly influential community in several key regions and countries.

That activism is worrying Sunni leaders and Washington, which has long had troubled relations with Shia governments and groups.

King Abdullah of Jordan warned last year that Iran's oil wealth and regional influence could lead to a "Shia crescent" across the Middle East that posed security and religious challenges.

The Iranian-born American scholar, Vali Nasr, raised eyebrows and fears in the U.S. recently with an essay in Foreign Affairs magazine "When the Shi'ites Rise."

From Iran to Lebanon, Bahrain to eastern Saudi Arabia's oilfields, the growing power of Shia Muslims is prompting interest, concern, and occasionally violence or repression by Sunnis. In part, it's because Iran is awash with petro-dollars from high oil prices.

That enables Tehran to fund and arm groups like Hezbollah in Lebanon, and to send humanitarian aid to Shia communities hit by poverty or the effects of war.

Iran is also reaping the benefits of two military actions launched by its arch-enemy, the United States. The toppling of the Taliban in Afghanistan and Saddam Hussein's regime in Baghdad have removed two neighbouring Sunni regimes that helped check Tehran's regional ambitions.

Iraq's Shia majority is taking up a long-denied mantle, political dominance in its own country, and Iran is firmly behind its co-religionists in every sense.

Shia Muslim devotees in Afghanistan whipping themselves with metal flails at Moharram, a grief-ridden festival that marks the martyrdom of Hussein, grandson of the Prophet of Mohammed, and one of the acknowledged founders of the Shia tradition.

Washington had hoped a Shia-led government in Baghdad would be a natural ally in the region, but Iraqi administrations so far have been far closer to Tehran than U.S. planners would like.

Nor are Iraq's security forces anywhere near being capable of offsetting Iranian military prowess and the sheer size of its standing army, by far the largest in the Middle East.

What's most troubling to Sunni-led regimes is the effect of Iran's resurgence on their own often repressed and occasionally restive Shia populations. So sensitive is the issue of sectarian relations in some Muslim countries that Shias aren't even counted as being from a separate religious tradition.

Saudi Arabia and other Persian Gulf states do not even keep statistics about the number of Shias within their borders.

The tiny island nation of Bahrain is on the frontline of Shia-Sunni political confrontation in the Gulf. Rich in natural gas and probably the most democratic Arab country, Bahrain has a Shia majority but a Sunni governing elite. Violent confrontations between the communities in the past have given way to electoral politics that is still confrontational and fractious, but largely peaceful.

Bahrain's ruling al-Khalifa family started the democratization project and appears committed to maintaining it, but Iranian influence and political ambitions are still feared.

Saudi Arabia's Shia population officially doesn't exist. The government in Riyadh says simply that Saudi Arabia is 100 per cent Muslim.

In effect, that means Sunni because the assumption of many influential Saudi clergymen is that Shias are either apostate or not Islamic enough to be considered Muslims.

But in the oil-rich eastern provinces of the kingdom, hundreds of thousands of Shias are restive and concerned about their second-class status.

They are among the most enthusiastic participants in recent municipal elections in Saudi Arabia, but many Shia want far more than they're getting from the secretive, often repressive and sectarian Saudi system of government.

In Pakistan and Afghanistan, Shia minorities exist uneasily alongside large Sunni majorities. Sunni extremists, often aligned with al-Qaeda or the Taliban, have attacked Shia mosques and other targets, prompting retaliation.

Afghanistan's Shia are a visibly distinct ethnic group who are routinely discriminated against by most of the country's Sunni factions. In both countries, Iranian-influenced Shia assertiveness is having an impact on religious and communal attitudes.)

Critics recommend regional role of U.S. in Mideast
Perceptions of Iran's regional and pan-Shia ambitions have prompted the administration of U.S. President George W. Bush to alter some of its Middle East policies, according to media reports and analysts.

Washington takes Sunni concerns about Iran seriously, and has supported efforts by Saudi and Jordanian officials to contain Hezbollah in Lebanon. Critics of this approach say this is a risky strategy, and recommend instead that the U.S. talk to Iran about a more constructive regional role in the Middle East.

The respected commentator, Michael Young, of the Daily Star newspaper in Beirut, recently warned of the dangers of festering sectarian hostilities between the two traditions of Islam.

"Once opened, the floodgates of Sunni-Shiite antagonism could become a Leviathan," Young wrote in the Wall Street Journal, "...sweeping away the fragile reality on the ground.

Even in societies where Sunnis and Shiites now peacefully co-exist, sectarian discord would become the norm."

Allan W Janssen is the author of The Plain Truth About God-101 (what the church doesn't want you to know!) www.God-101.com

Labels: , , , , , ,

Sunday, March 25, 2007

They're just wild about Harry!

Rumours are spreading that Al-Quaeda has put a multi-million dollar price on the head of Britain's Prince Harry.

When he starts soldiering in the middle of May Muslim fighters are urged to either kill him or kidnap him to extract concessions and ransom from the British government.

Authorities, meanwhile, have said that Harry is not expected to be put in any situation where that would be possible.

If they were smart they would send him to guard the Falklands, or some such thing, rather than take a chance with an "all too tempting" target that would put Britain in a very difficult position.

Your "news from the front" scribe;
Allan W Janssen

Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, March 22, 2007

Let's "negotiate" with the Taliban. NOT!

In Canadian politics Jack Layton is about as far left as you can go without falling off the road altogether.

Jackie boy is the leader of the New Democratic Party, friends of labour, enemies of big business and promoter of welfare for everyone.

Jack and his buddies came up with the bright idea that instead of fighting the Taliban in Afghanistan and putting our boys lives at risk we should just withdraw and then open up a "DIALOGUE" with the rebels.

I guess Jack never heard of Chamberlain and how he tried that with Hitler or he is just living in a fools paradise.

(Just so we understand each other I believe the situation in Iraq and Afghanistan are totally different. Iraq is a civil war because Shia and Sunni have never been able to get along. Afghanistan is a country that was hijacked by fanatics and you DON'T negotiate with them. It's their way or the highway.........Jack!)

Your "get a grip, Jack" scribe;
Allan W Janssen

Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, March 16, 2007

It's about the oil, stupid!

I think we can all agree on a few things about the American Administration's policies.

First, the Middle-East is all about the oil. End of story!

Next, in spite of what the U.S. Administration says, Iraq is in a civil war and those S.O.B.'s are out of control. The U.S. should just get out and let them sort it out themselves. End of Story!

Global warming is a fact in spite of what Georgie says and it might be partly due to increased sun activity but is mostly from greenhouse gases. End of story!

Evolution is a fact and the best way to prove it is by what Lewis Black keeps saying, pure and simple, FOSSILS..... fossils, fossils, fossils! Damn it! End of story!

And now as the icing on the cake, this piece from Reuters News;

LOS ANGELES - The Bush administration wants to eliminate federal support for geothermal power just as many US states are looking to cut greenhouse gas emissions and raise renewable power output.

The move has angered scientists who say there is enough hot water underground to meet all US electricity needs without greenhouse gas emissions.

"The Department of Energy has not requested funds for geothermal research in our fiscal-year 2008 budget," said Christina Kielich, a spokeswoman for the Department of Energy. "Geothermal is a mature technology. Our focus is on breakthrough energy research and development."

The administration of George W. Bush has made renewable energy a priority as it seeks to wean the United States off foreign oil, but it emphasizes use of biofuels like ethanol and biodiesel for vehicles and nuclear research for electricity.

"In spite of its enormous potential, the geothermal option for the United States has been largely ignored," a recent study led by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology said.

Story by Bernie Woodall


Now, here is the kicker, boys and girls. Just as the Bush Administration has promoted the largest military budget in history to keep his Republican allies at Haliburton and other military contractors happy, he has cut funding for Geothermal and is concentrating on Biofuels and Nuclear instead.

Why? Because Biofuels and Nuclear have huge lobbies and Geothermal has NONE! Right now the score looks like this:

Nuclear and Biofuel Lobby = Billions

Geothermal = None

Just so you know!

Your "enquiring mind" scribe;
Allan W Janssen

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, January 29, 2007

Dodgers and Deserters Deserted by Canada!!

Matt Lowell is a young guy from Michigan with a problem!

He is one of thirteen men who have deserted from the Army in protest of the Iraq war and applied for refugee protection in Canada, Ottawa says. So far, all the claims have been rejected!

Lowell, a quiet Michigan native who arrived in London by accident, just received the Immigration and Refugee Board's decision on his case.

Eight pages long, it can be summed up in one word: NO!


Things have changed in Canada with the election of a Conservative government and draft dodgers and deserters are not as welcome as they were under the old Liberals. (F.Y.I. - The Liberals are the Canadian Democrats and Conservatives are the Republicans. The big difference is that both Canadian Parties are ideologically more centrist than their U.S. counterparts.)

"I told my mom they said no and I don't know what to do now," said Lowell, 22, standing in the kitchen of a modest east-end home where he rents a room with money from welfare.

"I'm so sick of running."

During the first of three times he went AWOL from his duty station in Fort Lewis, Wash., Lowell stumbled upon the Forest City.

He'd driven home to Michigan before crossing into Canada, Toronto-bound. He stopped in London that night in September 2003 and rented a motel room.

In the morning, Lowell realized he liked what he saw. "I woke up and thought, this is pretty nice. Not too big, not too small."

He stayed about six months, doing odd jobs, before his mom convinced him to return to Fort Lewis, about 320 kilometres south of Vancouver.

Lowell would leave twice more -- facing the prospect of military prison time for desertion -- and returned to London 15 months ago.

That's when he applied for refugee protection, like high-profile Iraq war resister Jeremy Hinzman.

Also like Hinzman, his application would be denied.

In the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks, the gung-ho 17-year-old had signed up for the U.S. army with one goal.

"I wanted to go to Afghanistan and take down Osama bin Laden," Lowell said. "I was so proud . . . when I signed up."

He arrived in Fort Lewis in July 2002, showing natural acumen with weapons, earning praise from his squad leaders and awaiting his call to Afghanistan.

Then, things changed.

In March 2003, the U.S. government turned its sights on Saddam Hussein. The young soldier was now bound for a war not in Afghanistan, but Iraq.

Though his enthusiasm didn't waver at first, a short visit home changed that.

"Everybody was watching the news and that's when I started hearing they still haven't found the weapons of mass destruction and they're bombing the hell out of Iraq," Lowell said.

"I felt it was the wrong war."

When showing up drunk to drills wasn't enough to get kicked out, Lowell simply left three times -- the second time just two days before he was to leave for Iraq.

He twice returned to Fort Lewis, once voluntarily and once under military order. He was facing jail time for desertion when he left for good in November 2005. He's been in London since.

The recent immigration board decision likely means Lowell could be shipped back to the U.S. within the next year.

His punishment for desertion, the board's decision reads, wouldn't amount to persecution or . . . cruel and unusual punishment -- factors that can lead to successful refugee claims in Canada.

Times change and one of the best indicators of that is that the numbers have changed from the Vietnam era till now. Back then it was in the tens of thousands, while today is just the "Unlucky 13!"

Let's hope that doesn't change!

Your "at the front" scribe;
Allan W Janssen

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, January 11, 2007

Fools "Rush" In

I was driving from London to Sarnia this afternoon and I tuned in to Rush Limburger on WJR Detroit.(The Great Voice of the Great Lakes)

Now I don't necessarily agree or disagree with Rush but I do find him entertaining and today, as usual, he didn't disappoint!

As I said before, I am neither a Liberal nor Conservative since my views seem to be all over the map. (That means I go with what makes SENSE!) I did however, get a chuckle from Rush today because he was commenting on Bush's "Surge" program to put more troops into Iraq.

I knew something was up when he sent that second Aircraft Carrier Battle Group into the Middle-East, (See "Bush is up to something!") and Rush had his usual pontifications on why that happened.

His explanation was that "Bush wanted the extra troops to achieve a decisive victory over the terrorists" at which point I almost choked and drove off the road.

Talk about beating a dead horse! How can the Re publican's even think of trying to bring up terrorists when everyone in the world knows that the situation in Iraq is a civil war being fought on religious and political lines and really doesn't have much to do with the United States or terrorism!

We all know what it's about. We know why the U. S. is still in Iraq;
IT'S ABOUT THE OIL, STUPID!
(See "Now you know the "real" rest of the story!")

If it wasn't for the oil, America would have bailed a long time ago and let those crazy Arabs sort it out themselves!

I know Rush is a pretty smart guy but why does he always take us for idiots???

Your "Capitol" Scribe;
Allan W Janssen

Labels: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, January 03, 2007

Bush is up to something!

Georgie Porgie is up to something!!!!!!

He now has the problem of Saddam solved by killing him before he could spill the beans on the CIA. Any of the other trials he was scheduled to "attend" would have afforded him too much of an opportunity to do damage to the Administration!

What he has planned next is not entirely clear, but he will definitely have to do something as time is against him. A good war is always a sure-fire (no pun intended this time!) way to divert attention from domestic problems!

The Pentagon is sending a second aircraft carrier and its escort ships to the Gulf, defense officials said Today. This is supposedly as a warning to Syria and Iran.

With this in mind we can expect some sort of manufactured "crisis" in the Middle-East some time in the next few weeks!

Officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the USS John C. Stennis strike group would deploy this month. It will put 5,000 more U.S. sailors in the region, bringing the total to 16,000. (The USS Dwight D. Eisenhower aircraft carrier group entered the Gulf in December.)

Pentagon representative Bryan Whitman declined to comment, saying the Defense Department would not discuss future deployments, ship movements, or reasons behind them!

However, military analysts said the move was intended to demonstrate U.S. resolve in the face of acts by Iran and Syria that it sees as provocative, such as Tehran's pursuit of its nuclear program.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates previously said the increased American presence in the Gulf was a message to the region as a whole and not a response to any specific action by Iran.

"I think the message that we are sending to everyone, not just Iran, is that the United States is an enduring presence in this part of the world," Gates told reporters on a December visit to Baghdad. "We will be here for a long time and everybody needs to remember that -- both our friends and those who might consider themselves our adversaries."

As if the civil war in Iraq is not enough, God only knows what is in store for us next!

Your "war analyst" scribe;
Allan W Janssen

Labels: , , , ,

Sunday, October 22, 2006

Do we move the Jews again?

A couple of notes on the Mid-East situation.

A senior U.S. diplomat has criticized his country's role in Iraq while President George W. Bush says the United States is still expecting to win the war, but is changing its tactics.

"We tried to do our best but I think there is much room for criticism because there was arrogance and stupidity from the United States in Iraq," Alberto Fernandez, an Arabic-speaking diplomat in the State Department's bureau of Near Eastern affairs, said on Al-Jazeera television on Saturday.

Well, this is all fine and good for making political hay but the sad fact of the matter is that most of the trouble in Iraq has little to do with the U.S.

Irag is in a state of virtual "civil war" and it's not against the States as much as it is the (Iranian sponsored) Shia against the Sunni Arabs. Until this issue (and the Kurds) is resolved there will be no peace or harmony in that country.

The U.S. has one of two options, either get further involved in a no-win situation or get the hell out. Period.

NOW, I said some weeks ago that I would look at the situation in the Middle East in general terms and see if there was a solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict.

After pondering this difficult question for days on end I am afraid that the only thing that will heal tensions in the Middle-East is TIME.

No amount of brokering will solve conflicts there in an expedient manner.

No amount of negotiations will heal the rift between factions in the Middle East except distance.

No person will have the sway and influence to unite all the parties in a comprehensive peace process.

No. Other than letting time make these issues irrelevant the only other solution would be to take all the Israelies and move them to the United States.

The best solution there would be to give/sell the Jews "Long-Island" and let them set up the state of Israel there.

It's either that or put them in Utah. We can then send all the Mormons to the Middle East, where with their multiple-wives, they would fit in quite nicely!!!

(Now we all know that this last suggestion was done "tongue-in-cheek" but the sad fact of the matter is that it has about as much chance of happening as any other solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict.)

Your Mid-East Peace Broker
Allan W Janssen

Allan W Janssen is the author of The Plain Truth About God-101 (what the church doesn't want you to know!) at; www.God-101.com
And the petition to have people mind their own business instead of yours at; http://www.petitiononline.com/moses/petition.html

Labels: , , , , , ,

Tuesday, September 19, 2006

Pope This!

There is a group called "Al-Qaida in Iraq" that yesterday warned that war against Christianity and the West will go on until Islam "takes over the world."

No apology by the Pope will be sufficient they said, while demonstrators in South Asia and Indonesia carried black flags and burned effigies of the Pope as well.

"Al-Qaeda in Iraq" went on to say: "You and the West are doomed, as you can see from your defeat in Iraq, Afghanistan, Chechnya and elsewhere!"

In Iran, meanwhile, supreme leader (doesn't this remind you of "fearless leader" on the Rocky and Bullwinkle show?") Ayatollah Ali Khamenei called for protests against the U.S.

Ali argued that while the Pope may have been decieved into making his remarks, the words give the West an "excuse for suppressing Muslims" by depicting them as terrorists!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Right!

Labels: , , , , ,